News Flash Home
The original item was published from 11/11/2025 2:00:00 PM to 11/11/2025 2:01:47 PM.

News Flash

Water Quality & Conservation

Posted on: November 11, 2025

[ARCHIVED] Kinnickinnic Headwaters Groundwater Protection Plan Development

Boy Drinking Water

Figure 1 Project AreaThe Kinnickinnic River begins its journey in the agricultural landscapes east of Roberts and Hammond, WI, an area now at the heart of a new groundwater protection initiative led by St. Croix County Land and Water Conservation, with funding from the USDA National Water Quality Initiative (NWQI). Nitrate levels in municipal wells in this area have been rising over the past 25 years, and many private wells already exceed safe drinking water standards. In an effort to protect the groundwater in this area, the County will develop a protection plan which will evaluate existing nitrogen best management practices (BMPs) that could be cost shared using USDA programs.

Project Area:    
Three HUC-12 watersheds are covered in the project (Twin Lakes, Headwaters, Baldwin-Rush River), encompassing approximately 67,000 acres, primarily in the Towns of Warren, Hammond, Erin Prairie, and Baldwin (Figure 1). Natural springs in this area form the headwaters of the Kinnickinnic River, a Class I trout stream, and recharge the aquifer that supplies drinking water to the Village of Roberts and Hammond. 

Over the past 25 years, nitrate-nitrogen levels in municipal wells in this area have gradually increased but remain below the 10 ppm drinking water standard (Figure 2). However, 24% of private wells in the area already exceed this standard, reflecting the vulnerability of groundwater in this region (Table 1).

Nitrates Graph








Table 1. Kinnickinnic Headwaters Nitrate-N data from 619 private wells over the past 25 years.

HUC-12 (# samples)
Average Nitrate (ppm)
Percentage Exceeding 10 ppm Standard

Twin Lakes (n = 171)

7.27

32.2%

Headwaters (n = 205)

9.33

38.5%

Baldwin/Rush River (n = 243)

4.73

6.2%

TOTAL (n = 619)

6.96

24.1%

 
Project Outline: 

  1. Use existing groundwater data to determine nitrate loading.
  2. Develop a nitrogen budget for the project area that explains nitrate loading.   Use the developed budget tool to determine the level of nitrogen leaching reduction needed to safeguard drinking water.
  3. Evaluate nitrogen load reduction scenarios that implement known BMP’s such as cover crops, crop rotation, and nitrogen fertilizer management to determine the impact of stacking these practices.
  4. Calculate the necessary funding required to implement BMP’s at a scale sufficient to protect groundwater.
  5. Develop an outreach and education plan to reach landowners and producers. 

Results
Nitrogen load for the Upper Prairie du Chien aquifer in the Roberts/Hammond area was calculated using 619 domestic well test results. Aquifer recharge was assumed to equal discharge. Five years of land use data (2020-2024) was used to develop a nitrogen budget reflecting current conditions (Table 2). The total nitrogen load for the baseline HUC-12 area budgets were within 0.4% to 2.5% of that calculated using groundwater data (Table 3).

Table 2. Nitrogen load calculation based on known well nitrate concentrations.

HUC-12
Average Nitrate (ppm)
Land Area (acres)
Lbs Per Acre Delivered in 7ac-in Water
Annual Load for entire HUC-12 Area (Lbs/year)

Twin Lakes

7.27

9,686

11.53

111,712

Headwaters

9.33

28,768

14.80

425,644

Baldwin/Rush River

4.73

28,673

7.50

215,112

TOTAL

6.96

67,130 ac

Avg = 11.2 lbs/ac

752,467

 

Table 3. Baseline nitrogen budget for Kinnickinnic Plan area.

Leaching SourceTwin Lakes   HUC 12Headwaters HUC 12Baldwin-Rush River HUC 12Total LeachedPercent Contribution

 

- - - - -  lbs/ per HUC 12 Per year - - - - - 

%

Corn

86,739

303,259

157,691

547,690

71.9%

Soybean

12,753

51,623

14,998

79,374

10.4%

Alfalfa, grassland, other crops

1,45Nitrates 5

3,889

2,831

8,175

1.1%

Manure Application

2,112

48,664

31,080

81,856

10.7%

Septic System Leaching

7,340

17,580

11,280

36,200

4.8%

Septage Application

901

2,620

420

3,941

0.5%

Lawn Fertilizer

848

1,870

2,132

4,850

0.6%

Nitrogen Load Estimate

112,148

429,505

220,431

762,085

100.0%

Calc. From Water Samples

111,712

425,644

215,112

752,468

 

Comparison

100.4%

100.9%

102.5%

101.3%

 

 
Nitrogen Load Scenarios Evaluated

  1. Worst Case – Adjustments were made to baseline to reflect the possibility of an increase in corn acres (+10%), an increase in manure application (2X), and an increase in the number of homes (+10% homes)
  2. Baseline – existing conditions and balanced closely to groundwater loading (Table 3).
  3. 50% Conservation – Adjustments were made to baseline to show the impact of 50% adoption of nitrogen BMP’s, 50% adoption of lower manure rates, and 50% adoption of cover crops following soybeans.
  4. 90% Conservation – Adjustments were made to baseline to show a 90% adoption of BMPs.
  5. Full Protection – Adjustments were made to baseline to show 100% BMP adoption. In addition, 1,500 acres of land in sensitive areas would be taken out of production and enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRPTable 4 Predicted average groundwater nitrate levels associated with test scenariosTable 5 Predicted percentage of homes exceeding drinking water standard

Conclusions
The baseline nitrogen budget accurately represents current groundwater nitrate concentrations. The Twin Lakes and Kinnickinnic Headwaters watersheds are particularly susceptible to nitrate leaching than other areas of the County.  This is largely due to a higher percentage of sandy soils (over 20%), and shallow depth to bedrock and groundwater.  Therefore, while agricultural practices in the project area are similar to those elsewhere in the County, the local soils and geology contribute to greater nitrate loss. Implementing agronomic BMPs to reduce nitrogen leaching is a feasible and effective strategy for improving groundwater quality.  Modeling results indicate that implementing the 50% Conservation scenario would cost ~$300k per year to cover cost-share assistance, technical support, outreach, and monitoring for the Twin Lakes and Kinnickinnic Headwaters HUC-12 areas.

Facebook Twitter Email

Other News in Water Quality & Conservation

Picture2

Gully Stabilization Benefits

Posted on: August 18, 2025
Buckthorn Thumb

Fighting Back Against Buckthorn

Posted on: July 9, 2025
Streambank Restoration thumb

Streambank Stabilization Benefits

Posted on: July 9, 2025